What is Red Cat about
Red Cat is on a mission to secure the future of the entire drone community, by creating better technology through open source software, hardware and a token ecosystem that can enable ownership for customers, employees and shareholders. Red Cat token can help secure the future of the drone community, by creating a token ecosystem that can enable ownership for customers, employees and shareholders.
Red Cat ICO Review and Analysis
Review and analysis of Red Cat by ICO analysts:
Strenghts
- Quite expereinced team in their respected industry
- Highly attractive hard cap from an investors perspective
- Very good business plan presentation compared to industry average
potential concerns
- No previous blockchain experience found
- No reviews or media articles found on organic Google searches at the time of review
- Extremely small social media channels at the time of review
Red Cat ICO Rating: BB
Red Cat rating breakdown by ICO analysts - Learn more about the rating and grading here
| Rating category | Rating | Comments |
|---|
| Team legitimity | 2.85 | |
| LinkedIn Profiles | 3 | Quite expereinced team in their respected industry |
| Background of Lead Team Members | 4 | |
| Team Assembly and Commitment | 2.75 | |
| Team Skill Set Relevance | 2.5 | |
| Team Skill Set Balance (biz / tech / blockchain) | 2 | No previous blockchain experience found |
| First Impression | 3 | Great |
| Potential of tokenization model | 2.4 | |
| Blockchain Development | 2.5 | |
| Disruptive Blockchain Advantage | 2 | |
| Need for a Custom Token (vs. BTC or ETH) | 2 | There really is no need for blockchain, censorship resistance technology or a custom token |
| System Decentralization (besides token) | 2 | |
| Contribution to Blockchain Ecosystem | 3.5 | |
| Hard Cap | 4.5 | Highly attractive hard cap from an investors perspective |
| Token allocation + Fund allocation | 3 | |
| Professionalism of the available material | 4.25 | All available materials were highly professional |
| Comprehensiveness | 3.5 | |
| Readability | 4 | |
| Transparency | 3.5 | |
| Business Plan Presentation | 4.75 | Very good business plan presentation compared to industry average |
| Technology Presentation | 4 | |
| Realism of the roadmap compared to the team size and budget | 3.25 | |
| Concreteness | 4 | |
| Feasiblity | 3 | |
| Vision | 2.75 | |
| Dependencies (other services or capabilities required) | 3.75 | |
| Current Position | 3 | |
| Partnership network | 2 | |
| Background of the managing organization | 4 | Extensive history of the managing organization |
| Size of social media communities | 1 | Extremely small social media channels at the time of review |
| Reviews on other ICO sites and media | 1.75 | No reviews or media articles found on organic Google searches at the time of review |
| Is it easy to find the relevant information from the provided materials? | 4 | |
